<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for devermind.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://devermind.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://devermind.com</link>
	<description>Adrian Grigore's software development weblog. Motto: I will not waste my time looking for a clever motto.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:17:23 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on ASP.NET MVC Tip #4: Client-side form validation made easy &#8211; Part 2 by newbie</title>
		<link>http://devermind.com/aspnet-mvc/asp-net-mvc-tip-4-client-side-form-validation-made-easy-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-515</link>
		<dc:creator>newbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devermind.com/?p=219#comment-515</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I use asp.net mvc 2 beta 2, I cant compile the project. Maybe bindingContext.ValueProvider change in asp.net mvc 2 beta 2. If you have spare time, would you please update the code with the latest version. Thank you very much.

newbie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I use asp.net mvc 2 beta 2, I cant compile the project. Maybe bindingContext.ValueProvider change in asp.net mvc 2 beta 2. If you have spare time, would you please update the code with the latest version. Thank you very much.</p>
<p>newbie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ASP.NET MVC Tip #2: Turn on compile-time View Checking by ASP.NET MVC 2: Strongly Typed Html Helpers &#173; Share My Live</title>
		<link>http://devermind.com/aspnet/aspnet-mvc-tip-turn-on-compile-time-view-checking/comment-page-1/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>ASP.NET MVC 2: Strongly Typed Html Helpers &#173; Share My Live</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devermind.com/?p=139#comment-514</guid>
		<description>[...] expressions when referencing models/viewmodels passed to a view template.&#160; This enables better compile-time checking of views (so that bugs can be found at build-time as opposed to runtime), and also enables better code [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] expressions when referencing models/viewmodels passed to a view template.&#160; This enables better compile-time checking of views (so that bugs can be found at build-time as opposed to runtime), and also enables better code [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Updated: Generic base class for LINQ2SQL data layers by Adrian Grigore</title>
		<link>http://devermind.com/linq/updated-generic-base-class-for-linq2sql-data-layers/comment-page-1/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Grigore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 07:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devermind.com/?p=79#comment-511</guid>
		<description>What VS version are you using?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What VS version are you using?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ASP.NET MVC Tip #4: Client-side form validation made easy &#8211; Part 2 by Adrian Grigore</title>
		<link>http://devermind.com/aspnet-mvc/asp-net-mvc-tip-4-client-side-form-validation-made-easy-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Grigore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 07:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devermind.com/?p=219#comment-510</guid>
		<description>My approach also uses jquery.validate for the client side. The difference to your approach is that you are writing client-side validation rules separately in javascript whereas my approach generates these from your model definition for you. 

This is not only less effort, but also less error prone since means that even if you add some more validation rules or some new properties to your model, client-side validation always stays up to date automatically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My approach also uses jquery.validate for the client side. The difference to your approach is that you are writing client-side validation rules separately in javascript whereas my approach generates these from your model definition for you. </p>
<p>This is not only less effort, but also less error prone since means that even if you add some more validation rules or some new properties to your model, client-side validation always stays up to date automatically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ASP.NET MVC Tip #4: Client-side form validation made easy &#8211; Part 2 by Michael Ceranski</title>
		<link>http://devermind.com/aspnet-mvc/asp-net-mvc-tip-4-client-side-form-validation-made-easy-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-509</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ceranski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devermind.com/?p=219#comment-509</guid>
		<description>I prefer doing client side validation with jquery and the validator plugin. It is so easy to use and has built in pattern matching for email, credit cards, urls and more. See my blog post for more details: http://www.codecapers.com/post/Client-Side-Validation-with-jQuery.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer doing client side validation with jquery and the validator plugin. It is so easy to use and has built in pattern matching for email, credit cards, urls and more. See my blog post for more details: <a href="http://www.codecapers.com/post/Client-Side-Validation-with-jQuery.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.codecapers.com/post/Client-Side-Validation-with-jQuery.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ASP.NET MVC Tip #1: Using Custom ViewModels with POST action methods by Adrian Grigore</title>
		<link>http://devermind.com/linq/aspnet-mvc-using-custom-viewmodels-with-post-action-methods/comment-page-1/#comment-508</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Grigore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devermind.com/?p=102#comment-508</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I haven&#039;t had the time to have a look at MVC2&#039;s templates yet. I&#039;ve only just migrated my current MVC project to the MVC 2 codebase this week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I haven&#8217;t had the time to have a look at MVC2&#8217;s templates yet. I&#8217;ve only just migrated my current MVC project to the MVC 2 codebase this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ASP.NET MVC Tip #1: Using Custom ViewModels with POST action methods by Ben</title>
		<link>http://devermind.com/linq/aspnet-mvc-using-custom-viewmodels-with-post-action-methods/comment-page-1/#comment-507</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devermind.com/?p=102#comment-507</guid>
		<description>I have found that Html.EditorForModel() doesn&#039;t work in this case; the SelectLists don&#039;t render. If I manually bind the SelectLists using Html.DropdownListFor, it does work. Have you found a way to use EditorForModel() in this case?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have found that Html.EditorForModel() doesn&#8217;t work in this case; the SelectLists don&#8217;t render. If I manually bind the SelectLists using Html.DropdownListFor, it does work. Have you found a way to use EditorForModel() in this case?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Updated: Generic base class for LINQ2SQL data layers by Mike</title>
		<link>http://devermind.com/linq/updated-generic-base-class-for-linq2sql-data-layers/comment-page-1/#comment-505</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devermind.com/?p=79#comment-505</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t get the demo to work.  I load the website and receive the below error.

ObjectDataSource &#039;BillsListObjectDataSource&#039; could not find a non-generic method &#039;LoadAll&#039; that has parameters: ID.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t get the demo to work.  I load the website and receive the below error.</p>
<p>ObjectDataSource &#8216;BillsListObjectDataSource&#8217; could not find a non-generic method &#8216;LoadAll&#8217; that has parameters: ID.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ASP.NET MVC Tip #1: Using Custom ViewModels with POST action methods by Al Dass</title>
		<link>http://devermind.com/linq/aspnet-mvc-using-custom-viewmodels-with-post-action-methods/comment-page-1/#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Dass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devermind.com/?p=102#comment-501</guid>
		<description>FYI: 

That link to Phil&#039;s site in Adrian&#039;s previous post is invalid... here is the correct link:

&quot;Model Binding To A List&quot;
http://haacked.com/archive/2008/10/23/model-binding-to-a-list.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI: </p>
<p>That link to Phil&#8217;s site in Adrian&#8217;s previous post is invalid&#8230; here is the correct link:</p>
<p>&#8220;Model Binding To A List&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://haacked.com/archive/2008/10/23/model-binding-to-a-list.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://haacked.com/archive/2008/10/23/model-binding-to-a-list.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ASP.NET MVC Tip #2: Turn on compile-time View Checking by ASP.NET MVC 2: Strongly Typed Html Helpers &#171; Turgay Ceylan</title>
		<link>http://devermind.com/aspnet/aspnet-mvc-tip-turn-on-compile-time-view-checking/comment-page-1/#comment-471</link>
		<dc:creator>ASP.NET MVC 2: Strongly Typed Html Helpers &#171; Turgay Ceylan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devermind.com/?p=139#comment-471</guid>
		<description>[...] expressions when referencing models/viewmodels passed to a view template.&#160; This enables better compile-time checking of views (so that bugs can be found at build-time as opposed to runtime), and also enables better code [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] expressions when referencing models/viewmodels passed to a view template.&#160; This enables better compile-time checking of views (so that bugs can be found at build-time as opposed to runtime), and also enables better code [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
